"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
[...]
> + [(set (attr "length")
> +(if_then_else
> +(lt (minus (pc) (match_dup 0)) (const_int 1024))
> + (const_int 4)
> + (const_int 6)))
> + (set_attr "type" "branch")])
>
> Shouldn't that be using "ltu" rather than
On 10/02/2021 17:44, Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches writes:
>
>> "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
>>
>>> On 09/02/2021 16:27, Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches wrote:
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:09:43PM +0100, Jakub
Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches writes:
> "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
>
>> On 09/02/2021 16:27, Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>>>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:09:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>>"TARGET_32BIT &&
