Re: [PATCH v3] c++: Catch indirect change of active union member in constexpr [PR101631]

On 9/21/23 09:41, Nathaniel Shead wrote: I've updated the error messages, and also fixed another bug I found while retesting (value-initialised unions weren't considered to have any active member yet). Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. -- >8 -- This patch adds checks for

[PATCH v3] c++: Catch indirect change of active union member in constexpr [PR101631]

I've updated the error messages, and also fixed another bug I found while retesting (value-initialised unions weren't considered to have any active member yet). Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. -- >8 -- This patch adds checks for attempting to change the active member of a