On Sat, 13 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ declaration}, and it serves the purpose of making the
> name @code{len}
> known when the declaration of @code{data} is parsed.
>
> You can write any number of such parameter forward declarations in the
> -parameter list. The
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 08:53:37PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > +You can write any number of such parameter forward declaration lists,
> > +but using more than one is obsolete and unnecessary.
>
> I'm dubious of declaring it
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> +You can write any number of such parameter forward declaration lists,
> +but using more than one is obsolete and unnecessary.
I'm dubious of declaring it obsolete.
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmy...@redhat.com
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 09:34:13PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 06:57:23PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ declaration}, and it serves the purpose of making the
> >
Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 06:57:23PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ declaration}, and it serves the purpose of making the
> > name @code{len}
> > known when the declaration of @code{data} is parsed.
> >
> > You ca
Warn about this:
void f(int x; int x; int x);
Add a new diagnostic, -Wmultiple-parameter-fwd-decl-lists, which
diagnoses uses of this obsolescent syntax.
Add this diagnostic in -Wextra.
Forward declarations of parameters are very rarely used. And functions
that need two forward declara
