Hi,
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This is a new version of previous patch
> >> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00020.html), fixed
> >> after Rainer's remarks.
> > Hi,
> > the patch looks OK, but I wonder why you included can_be_discard
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a new version of previous patch
>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00020.html), fixed
>> after Rainer's remarks.
> Hi,
> the patch looks OK, but I wonder why you included can_be_discarded check?
> If funct
> Hi all,
>
> This is a new version of previous patch
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00020.html), fixed
> after Rainer's remarks.
Hi,
the patch looks OK, but I wonder why you included can_be_discarded check?
If function is in comdat I believe the optimization still can happen.
Pe
Hi all,
This is a new version of previous patch
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00020.html), fixed
after Rainer's remarks.
-Y
pr56727-2.patch
Description: Binary data