Sorry for the delayed reply.
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 09:44 +0200, Christian Bruel wrote:
On 03/30/2014 11:02 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:58 +0100, Christian Bruel wrote:
This patches adds a few instructions to the inlined builtin_strlen to
unroll the remaining
On 03/30/2014 11:02 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:58 +0100, Christian Bruel wrote:
This patches adds a few instructions to the inlined builtin_strlen to
unroll the remaining bytes for word-at-a-time loop. This enables to have
2 distinct execution paths (no fall-thru in
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:58 +0100, Christian Bruel wrote:
This patches adds a few instructions to the inlined builtin_strlen to
unroll the remaining bytes for word-at-a-time loop. This enables to have
2 distinct execution paths (no fall-thru in the byte-at-a-time loop),
allowing block
Hello,
This patches adds a few instructions to the inlined builtin_strlen to
unroll the remaining bytes for word-at-a-time loop. This enables to have
2 distinct execution paths (no fall-thru in the byte-at-a-time loop),
allowing block alignment assignation. This partially improves the
problem
Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
This patches adds a few instructions to the inlined builtin_strlen to
unroll the remaining bytes for word-at-a-time loop. This enables to have
2 distinct execution paths (no fall-thru in the byte-at-a-time loop),
allowing block alignment
