Re: [PING][PATCH] [AARCH64, NEON] Improve vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) and vld1(q?)_dup intrinsics

2014-12-05 Thread Marcus Shawcroft
On 19 November 2014 at 06:14, Yangfei (Felix) felix.y...@huawei.com wrote: Index: gcc/ChangeLog === --- gcc/ChangeLog (revision 217717) +++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +2014-11-13 Felix Yang

Re: [PING][PATCH] [AARCH64, NEON] Improve vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) and vld1(q?)_dup intrinsics

2014-11-18 Thread Marcus Shawcroft
On 17 November 2014 06:58, Yangfei (Felix) felix.y...@huawei.com wrote: PING? BTW: It seems that Alan's way of improving vld1(q?)_dup intrinsic is more elegant. So is the improvement of vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) OK for trunk? Thanks. Please rebase over Alan's patch and repost, thank you /Marcus

Re: [PING][PATCH] [AARCH64, NEON] Improve vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) and vld1(q?)_dup intrinsics

2014-11-18 Thread Yangfei (Felix)
On 17 November 2014 06:58, Yangfei (Felix) felix.y...@huawei.com wrote: PING? BTW: It seems that Alan's way of improving vld1(q?)_dup intrinsic is more elegant. So is the improvement of vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) OK for trunk? Thanks. Please rebase over Alan's patch and repost, thank you

[PING][PATCH] [AARCH64, NEON] Improve vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) and vld1(q?)_dup intrinsics

2014-11-16 Thread Yangfei (Felix)
PING? BTW: It seems that Alan's way of improving vld1(q?)_dup intrinsic is more elegant. So is the improvement of vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) OK for trunk? Thanks. Hi, This patch converts vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) and vld1(q?)_dup intrinsics to use builtin functions instead of the previous inline