Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-21 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
David, I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my proposal as a separate change? The patch seems like

[PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-20 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
Hi, I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my proposal as a separate change? Thanks, Maciej

Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-20 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com wrote: Hi, I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please

Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-20 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com wrote: Hi, I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see r216437

Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-20 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com wrote: Hi, I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would be