David,
I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would
be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I
see
r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my
proposal as a separate change?
The patch seems like
Hi,
I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would
be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see
r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my
proposal as a separate change?
Thanks,
Maciej
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki
ma...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would
be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see
r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki
ma...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would
be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see
r216437
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki
ma...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Hi,
I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would
be