Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-11-21 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 08:03:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > [1] FWIW the script I use for this is here: > https://github.com/davidmalcolm/gcc-build NUM_CORES=$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN || echo 1) You usually don't want to count offline processors. and in create_src, instead of

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-11-20 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 14:45 -0400, Eric Gallager wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Eric Gallager > wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:15 AM, David Malcolm > m> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 20:00 -0400, Eric Gallager wrote: > > > >

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-11-16 Thread Eric Gallager
Ping yet again: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00123.html On 11/9/17, Eric Gallager wrote: > Ping again: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00123.html > > On 11/2/17, Eric Gallager wrote: >> Ping:

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-11-09 Thread Eric Gallager
Ping again: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00123.html On 11/2/17, Eric Gallager wrote: > Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01834.html > > On 10/25/17, Eric Gallager wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Eric

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-11-02 Thread Eric Gallager
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01834.html On 10/25/17, Eric Gallager wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Eric Gallager > wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:15 AM, David Malcolm >> wrote: >>> On Sun,

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-10-25 Thread Eric Gallager
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:15 AM, David Malcolm wrote: >> On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 20:00 -0400, Eric Gallager wrote: >>> Attached is a version of >>>

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-09-30 Thread Eric Gallager
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:15 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 20:00 -0400, Eric Gallager wrote: >> Attached is a version of >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00481.html that >> contains >> a combination of both the fix and the testcase update,

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-09-29 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 11:15 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 20:00 -0400, Eric Gallager wrote: > > Attached is a version of > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00481.html that > > contains > > a combination of both the fix and the testcase update, as requested > >

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-09-29 Thread David Malcolm
On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 20:00 -0400, Eric Gallager wrote: > Attached is a version of > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00481.html that > contains > a combination of both the fix and the testcase update, as requested > in > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794#c2 > > I

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-09-25 Thread Eric Gallager
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg01107.html cc-ing additional libcpp (i.e. preprocessor) maintainers and diagnostic messages maintainers On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: > Attached is a version of >

Re: [PING][patch] PR81794: have "would be stringified in traditional C" warning in libcpp/macro.c be controlled by -Wtraditional

2017-09-17 Thread Eric Gallager
Attached is a version of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00481.html that contains a combination of both the fix and the testcase update, as requested in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794#c2 I had to use a different computer than I usually use to send this email, as