On 11 April 2014 00:10, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:41:12AM +0800, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Ping?
Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
Bootstrap on ARM. In ARM regression test, some new PASS and FAIL of
debug info check for
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 05:19:59PM +0800, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Or, fix up the insane arm costs for ASM_OPERANDS:
case ASM_OPERANDS:
/* Just a guess. Cost one insn per input. */
*cost = COSTS_N_INSNS (ASM_OPERANDS_INPUT_LENGTH (x));
return true;
I don't think
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:41:12AM +0800, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Ping?
Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
Bootstrap on ARM. In ARM regression test, some new PASS and FAIL of
debug info check for gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c and
gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-2.c since register
On 04/10/2014 09:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2014-04-10 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/60663
* cse.c (cse_insn): Set src_volatile on ASM_OPERANDS in
PARALLEL.
* gcc.target/arm/pr60663.c: New test.
Ok if it passes.
But you're right that ARM
Ping?
Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
Bootstrap on ARM. In ARM regression test, some new PASS and FAIL of
debug info check for gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c and
gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-2.c since register allocation result is
different with the patch. There is no real new FAIL due
