[PING] Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly

2014-04-29 Thread John Marino
Hi folks, Does anyone have any issues with this set of patches to add support for the DragonFly targets? It's a blocker for other patches of mine that have a more general benefit, but this (relatively simple) one has to go in first. Thanks, John On 4/20/2014 21:04, John Marino wrote: On

Re: [PING] Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly

2014-04-29 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:37 AM, John Marino gnu...@marino.st wrote: Does anyone have any issues with this set of patches to add support for the DragonFly targets? It's a blocker for other patches of mine that have a more general benefit, but this (relatively simple) one has to go in first.

Re: [PING] Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly

2014-04-29 Thread John Marino
On 4/29/2014 19:23, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:37 AM, John Marino gnu...@marino.st wrote: Does anyone have any issues with this set of patches to add support for the DragonFly targets? It's a blocker for other patches of mine that have a more general benefit, but this

Re: [PING] Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly

2014-04-29 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:37 PM, John Marino gnu...@marino.st wrote: I don't understand the benefit of libgcc/enable-execute-stack-bsd.c. The code seems the same as the existing libgcc/enable-execute-stack-mprotect.c. All you are changing is omitting need_enable_exec_stack. If you just drop