On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:11 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to gentle ping the below patch:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01225.html
> >
> > The previous version for more context/background:
> > https://gcc.gnu.
Hi Richard,
on 2019/7/12 下午8:11, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to gentle ping the below patch:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01225.html
>>
>> The previous version for more context/background:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:11:16PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Am I correct that doloop HW implementations are constrainted
> by a decrement of one?
GCC's doloop patterns are. Not all hardware is.
Segher
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to gentle ping the below patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01225.html
>
> The previous version for more context/background:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01126.html
>
> Thanks a lot in advance!
Hi all,
I'd like to gentle ping the below patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01225.html
The previous version for more context/background:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01126.html
Thanks a lot in advance!
on 2019/6/20 下午8:16, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry,
