On Tue, Nov 28 2017, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
...
>
> Done, this is what I have just committed. I will prepare a conservative
> fix for gcc 7 with only the expr_type_first_operand_type_p part.
>
The following is what I have committed to the gcc-7-branch after a round
of bootstrap and testing on an
re are at least tcc_expression codes we might want
> to handle in the future, the default: return false should be a good fallback.
> Adjust the function comment accordingly.
Done, this is what I have just committed. I will prepare a conservative
fix for gcc 7 with only the expr_type_f
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for getting so late to this. However...
>
> On Tue, Nov 14 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>> On 3 November
Hi,
sorry for getting so late to this. However...
On Tue, Nov 14 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On 3 November 2017 at 15:38, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov