>> here is a simple patch for a rejects-valid problem with deferred
>> type-bound procedures. This is the patch from comment 5 in the PR. A
>> simpler (but equivalent) patch can be found in comment 4. Both fix the
>> problem and are free of testsuite regressions.
>>
>> Is any of the two versions st
Janus Weil wrote:
here is a simple patch for a rejects-valid problem with deferred
type-bound procedures. This is the patch from comment 5 in the PR. A
simpler (but equivalent) patch can be found in comment 4. Both fix the
problem and are free of testsuite regressions.
Is any of the two versions
Ping! (From the silence I infer that this is rather 4.9 material?)
2013/1/19 Janus Weil :
> Hi all,
>
> here is a simple patch for a rejects-valid problem with deferred
> type-bound procedures. This is the patch from comment 5 in the PR. A
> simpler (but equivalent) patch can be found in comment
Hi all,
here is a simple patch for a rejects-valid problem with deferred
type-bound procedures. This is the patch from comment 5 in the PR. A
simpler (but equivalent) patch can be found in comment 4. Both fix the
problem and are free of testsuite regressions.
Is any of the two versions still ok f
