Re: [Patch, Fortran] (coarray) Add LOCK_TYPE

2011-06-20 Thread Tobias Burnus
Dear Paul, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: I have checked out the code for any obvious style or other minor errors and all looks well. However, I had a look at 8.5.6 "LOCK and UNLOCK statements" in the standard and can only confess to feeling very stupid tonight because I could not make head nor tai

Re: [Patch, Fortran] (coarray) Add LOCK_TYPE

2011-06-20 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Tobias, I have checked out the code for any obvious style or other minor errors and all looks well. However, I had a look at 8.5.6 "LOCK and UNLOCK statements" in the standard and can only confess to feeling very stupid tonight because I could not make head nor tail of the example. Thus, I

Re: [Patch, Fortran] (coarray) Add LOCK_TYPE

2011-06-20 Thread Tobias Burnus
*PING* On 06/16/2011 08:27 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: This patch adds ISO_Fortran_Env's LOCK_TYPE, tons of constraint checks and a simple implementation for -fcoarray=single. With the implementation of LOCK_TYPE and (UN)LOCK, gfortran can now parse all coarrays constructs of Fortran 2008. (Howe

[Patch, Fortran] (coarray) Add LOCK_TYPE

2011-06-15 Thread Tobias Burnus
This patch adds ISO_Fortran_Env's LOCK_TYPE, tons of constraint checks and a simple implementation for -fcoarray=single. With the implementation of LOCK_TYPE and (UN)LOCK, gfortran can now parse all coarrays constructs of Fortran 2008. (However, there are still known deficits and bugs in the r