2014-12-15 7:34 GMT+01:00 Tobias Burnus :
> Can you change "non-pure" to "impure"? That would better match the Fortran
> naming, where "impure" is the default unless "pure" or "elemental" is used.
> (It was added to permit "impure elemental" procedures.)
Yes, sure. I have committed this change as
Janus Weil wrote:
2014-12-14 12:00 GMT+01:00 FX :
Good point, thank you. Updated patch attached.
I guess I still new formal approval by someone with reviewer status …
OK
Thanks, committed as r218717.
Can you change "non-pure" to "impure"? That would better match the
Fortran naming, where "i
2014-12-14 12:00 GMT+01:00 FX :
>> Good point, thank you. Updated patch attached.
>> I guess I still new formal approval by someone with reviewer status …
>
> OK
Thanks, committed as r218717.
Cheers,
Janus
> Good point, thank you. Updated patch attached.
> I guess I still new formal approval by someone with reviewer status …
OK
>> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>
> s/'%s'/%qs/g
> nowadays.
Good point, thank you. Updated patch attached.
I guess I still new formal approval by someone with reviewer status ...
Cheers,
Janus
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
=
Hi all,
it's been a while since I have contributed to this list and to
gfortran, but it's good to see that you guys are still making a lot of
progress with this great compiler.
In any case, I recently found some time to prepare a small patch
related to my old pet (procedure pointers). It adds som
