Dear Tobias,
This is, of course, fine since it is 'obvious' (in my opinion at least).
Thanks for the patch
Paul
On 27 March 2014 21:05, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
An early * PING* for this wrong-code issue.
Tobias Burnus wrote:
This patch fixes part of the problems of the PR.
An early * PING* for this wrong-code issue.
Tobias Burnus wrote:
This patch fixes part of the problems of the PR. The problem is that
one assigns an array descriptor to an assumed-rank array descriptor.
The latter has for BT_CLASS the size of max_dim (reason: we have first
the data array and
This patch fixes part of the problems of the PR. The problem is that one
assigns an array descriptor to an assumed-rank array descriptor. The
latter has for BT_CLASS the size of max_dim (reason: we have first the
data array and than vtab). With true, one takes the TREE_TYPE from
the LHS (i.e.
