Le 21/07/2015 11:21, Uros Bizjak a écrit :
The new test introduced several testsuite failures, please see e.g. [1]:
Fixed with r226038
(Also, the name of the test is not correctly stated in the ChangeLog entry).
Fixed with r226033
Thanks
Mikael
Index: ChangeLog
==
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2015-07/msg01789.html
Dominique
Hello!
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:35:30PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
>> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-06/msg00075.html
>>
>
> Patch looks ok to me.
The new test introduced several testsuite failures, please see e.g. [1]:
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 -O0
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:35:30PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-06/msg00075.html
>
Patch looks ok to me.
--
Steve
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-06/msg00075.html
Le 21/06/2015 11:48, Mikael Morin a écrit :
> Le 16/05/2015 18:43, Mikael Morin a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> this is about PR61831 where in code like:
>>
>> type :: string_t
>> character(LEN=1), dimension(:), allocatable ::
Le 16/05/2015 18:43, Mikael Morin a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> this is about PR61831 where in code like:
>
> type :: string_t
> character(LEN=1), dimension(:), allocatable :: chars
> end type string_t
> type(string_t) :: prt_in
> (...)
> tmp = new_prt_spec (
Hello,
this is about PR61831 where in code like:
type :: string_t
character(LEN=1), dimension(:), allocatable :: chars
end type string_t
type(string_t) :: prt_in
(...)
tmp = new_prt_spec ([prt_in])
the deallocation of the argumen
