Re: [Patch, fortran] PR92753 - [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

2019-12-16 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Paul, Regtested on FC31/x86_64 - OK for 9- and 10- branches? OK. Thanks for the patch! Regards Thomas

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR92753 - [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

2019-12-15 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 06:41:50PM +, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > This patch is straight forward and well explained by the ChangeLogs. > The ICE comes about because the simplification of the inquiry_part_ref > expressions produced bad expressions. > > Thanks to Steve for spotting the error

[Patch, fortran] PR92753 - [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

2019-12-15 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
This patch is straight forward and well explained by the ChangeLogs. The ICE comes about because the simplification of the inquiry_part_ref expressions produced bad expressions. Thanks to Steve for spotting the error in the INQUIRY_RE and INQUIRY_IM parts that was so blindingly obvious that I