Re: [Patch, fortran] PR96320 - gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

2020-08-01 Thread Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches
Hi Thomas, I discovered the bit about the ChangeLogs last night but thanks for the warning:-) The commit message reads: This patch fixes PR96320. See the explanatory comment in the testcase. 2020-08-01 Paul Thomas gcc/fortran PR target/96320 * interface.c (gfc_check_dummy_characteristics):

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR96320 - gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

2020-08-01 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc-patches
Hi Paul, This is my first foray into gfortran for quite a little while so I am going cautiously on this 'obvious' patch. The comment in the patch and the ChangLog are clear enough that no further explanation is needed. Regtests on FC31.x86_64 - OK for trunk? If I read the PR correctly, this

[Patch, fortran] PR96320 - gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

2020-07-31 Thread Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches
Hi All, This is my first foray into gfortran for quite a little while so I am going cautiously on this 'obvious' patch. The comment in the patch and the ChangLog are clear enough that no further explanation is needed. Regtests on FC31.x86_64 - OK for trunk? I am a bit reluctant to get into