On 2019-08-09 5:23 p.m., Jeff Law wrote:
I've committed it after letting it bootstrap/regression test on ppc64le,
aarch64 and others. It also didn't regress on any of the *-elf targets
I'm testing which are far more likely to exercise this code.
Thank you, Jeff.
On 8/7/19 8:15 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 8/7/19 7:36 AM, senthilkumar.selva...@microchip.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60101.c fails with an ICE for the
>> avr target, because of a gcc_assert firing at reload1.c:4233
>>
>> The assert (in the patch below)
On 8/7/19 8:15 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 8/7/19 7:36 AM, senthilkumar.selva...@microchip.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60101.c fails with an ICE for the
>> avr target, because of a gcc_assert firing at reload1.c:4233
>>
>> The assert (in the patch below)
On 8/7/19 7:36 AM, senthilkumar.selva...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi,
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60101.c fails with an ICE for the
avr target, because of a gcc_assert firing at reload1.c:4233
The assert (in the patch below) looks bogus to me, as it's in
the if block of
if (!
Hi,
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, senthilkumar.selva...@microchip.com wrote:
> gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60101.c fails with an ICE for the
> avr target, because of a gcc_assert firing at reload1.c:4233
>
> The assert (in the patch below) looks bogus to me, as it's in
> the if block of
>
>
Hi,
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60101.c fails with an ICE for the
avr target, because of a gcc_assert firing at reload1.c:4233
The assert (in the patch below) looks bogus to me, as it's in
the if block of
if (! ira_conflicts_p || reg_renumber[i] >= 0)
For this testcase and for
