Re: [Ping #2][Patch, testsuite]: Don't xfail sibcalls on AVR

2011-04-08 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Gerald Pfeifer schrieb: On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: I signed a fsf copyright assignment. AFAIK there is no automatism that grants write access when copyright assignment is approved. Yes, this is correct. I would have to be maintainer or something like that. Nope. All

RE: [Ping #2][Patch, testsuite]: Don't xfail sibcalls on AVR

2011-04-06 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:55 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Anatoly Sokolov; Denis Chertykov Subject: Re: [Ping #2][Patch, testsuite]: Don't xfail sibcalls on AVR Target avr now

Re: [Ping #2][Patch, testsuite]: Don't xfail sibcalls on AVR

2011-04-06 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Weddington, Eric schrieb: -Original Message- From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de] To: Weddington, Eric Please commit, Johann. Thanks. I don't have write privilege, and I don't think I want write access at the moment. Oh! I didn't know. I thought you did. I signed a

RE: [Ping #2][Patch, testsuite]: Don't xfail sibcalls on AVR

2011-04-05 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 3:06 AM To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Anatoly Sokolov; Denis Chertykov; Weddington, Eric Subject: Re: [Ping #2][Patch, testsuite]: Don't xfail sibcalls on AVR Georg-Johann Lay

[Patch, testsuite]: Don't xfail sibcalls on AVR

2011-03-24 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Target avr now supports tail calls, so don't xfail on that. testsuite/ 2011-03-24 Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de * gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c: Don't xfail on AVR. * gcc.dg/sibcall-4.c: Don't xfail on AVR. Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c