Re: [Patch,Fortran] Fix tree-walking issue

2011-11-09 Thread Janne Blomqvist
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 09:33, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote: Dear all, attached is an updated version of Patch 2. The change is that I removed the global variable for fill_st_vector and updated the comment for do_traverse_symtree to make assumptions clearer. This version of the patch

Re: [Patch,Fortran] Fix tree-walking issue

2011-11-02 Thread Tobias Burnus
Dear all, attached is an updated version of Patch 2. The change is that I removed the global variable for fill_st_vector and updated the comment for do_traverse_symtree to make assumptions clearer. This version of the patch was build and regtested (gfortran + libgomp). OK? Dear Tobias S.,

[Patch,Fortran] Fix tree-walking issue (was: gfortran tree walking issue)

2011-11-01 Thread Tobias Burnus
Dear all, dear Paul, (For gcc-patch@ readers: gfortran has issues with tree walking: During traversal it does not touch all tree nodes if the function called during traversal adds new nodes to the tree - as this will rebalance the tree. This causes a regression with my recently posted RFC

Re: [Patch,Fortran] Fix tree-walking issue

2011-11-01 Thread Tobias Schlüter
Dear Tobias, On 2011-11-01 22:33, Tobias Burnus wrote: Regarding the tree-walking issue: I think it is a general issue which could also affect other things. I really wonder why we haven't been bitten by it before. However, it might be that we hit those problems and fixed them by re-resolving