Gerald,
it is ok ?
Tristan.
On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Jul 19, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 07/19/2012 08:30 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
No regression on i386 GNU/Linux.
Committed.
Nice. Is this NEWS / docs --or wherever release notes are
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
it is ok ?
Two minor changes, fine to commit with those.
1. Full stop at the end of the sentence.
2. Avoid extra ul.../ul pair, rather add this to the existing.
Thanks,
Gerald
On Jul 19, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I did a manual build and testing for x86_64-pc-mingw32 and I will run a
full bootstrap and regression run on GNU/Linux.
Tristan.
libstdc++-v3/
* libsupc++/eh_personality.cc (__gxx_personality_seh0): New function.
Adjust for
On Jul 17, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
2012/7/17 Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com:
On 07/17/2012 12:35 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
So, the first element of ExceptionInformation will be exc.
Should I add a comment ?
Ah right. Definitely.
Otherwise I don't see anything else in
On 07/19/2012 08:30 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
No regression on i386 GNU/Linux.
Committed.
Nice. Is this NEWS / docs --or wherever release notes are written-- worthy?
Something like this, borrowed from your own words:
On Win64, the compiler now emits SEH unwind info. GCC exceptions now
On Jul 19, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 07/19/2012 08:30 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
No regression on i386 GNU/Linux.
Committed.
Nice. Is this NEWS / docs --or wherever release notes are written-- worthy?
Something like this, borrowed from your own words:
On Win64, the
On 07/19/2012 11:15 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
To clarify, GCC emits SEH unwind info since 4.7, so I propose slightly
modified words:
Looks good to me. Thanks!
--
Pedro Alves
I did a manual build and testing for x86_64-pc-mingw32 and I will run a
full bootstrap and regression run on GNU/Linux.
Tristan.
libstdc++-v3/
* libsupc++/eh_personality.cc (__gxx_personality_seh0): New function.
Adjust for SEH.
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Add
On Jul 16, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 07/13/2012 07:13 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
+_Unwind_RaiseException (struct _Unwind_Exception *exc)
+{
+ memset (exc-private_, 0, sizeof (exc-private_));
+
+ RaiseException (STATUS_GCC_THROW, 0, 1, (ULONG_PTR *)exc);
We almost
On 07/17/2012 12:35 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
So, the first element of ExceptionInformation will be exc.
Should I add a comment ?
Ah right. Definitely.
Otherwise I don't see anything else in the way. Kai?
r~
2012/7/17 Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com:
On 07/17/2012 12:35 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
So, the first element of ExceptionInformation will be exc.
Should I add a comment ?
Ah right. Definitely.
Otherwise I don't see anything else in the way. Kai?
r~
No, I don't have any
On 07/13/2012 07:13 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
+_Unwind_RaiseException (struct _Unwind_Exception *exc)
+{
+ memset (exc-private_, 0, sizeof (exc-private_));
+
+ RaiseException (STATUS_GCC_THROW, 0, 1, (ULONG_PTR *)exc);
We almost certainly didn't want pointer-to-pointer...
r~
Hi,
this is a rebase of RTH's patch posted a few years ago. It is almost
unchanged, except that there is no SEH specific unwind.h header (there are 3
#if/#endif part in unwind-generic.h) and a minor cleanup in unwind-seh.c
(indentation, unused variables).
This patch allows to propagate GCC
13 matches
Mail list logo
