On 4/8/19 4:51 PM, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
On 08/04/19 14:00, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Matthew,
On 4/5/19 12:06 PM, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
Regtested on cross-compiler arm-none-eabi
Does this fix a PR?
If so, could you add the infor
On 08/04/19 14:00, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> On 4/5/19 12:06 PM, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
>> Regtested on cross-compiler arm-none-eabi
>>
>
> Does this fix a PR?
>
> If so, could you add the information for it to the Cha
Hi Matthew,
On 4/5/19 12:06 PM, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
Hi there,
The "*neon_mov" patterns for 128 bit sized quantities uses the "Dn"
constraint to match vmov.f32 and vmov.i patterns.
This constraint boils down to using the `neon_immediate_valid` function.
Once the constraint has matched, the
Hi there,
The "*neon_mov" patterns for 128 bit sized quantities uses the "Dn"
constraint to match vmov.f32 and vmov.i patterns.
This constraint boils down to using the `neon_immediate_valid` function.
Once the constraint has matched, the output C statement asserts that function
passes.
The output
