Hi Jakub,
On 30.06.22 10:21, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
So, what is the plan with reverse offload?
My idea was to just call omp_target_ext with
'device(omp_initial_device)'. This then automatically
works when called from a target region that runs on
omp_get_initial_device().
For the actual device
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 09:54:56PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Currently, this is a rather useless patch - even though it helps to reduce
> the number of local patches I have. Due to the printed sorry, adding a
> testcase with -fdump-tree-* is also not possible, yet.
>
> For reverse offload,
Currently, this is a rather useless patch - even though it helps to reduce
the number of local patches I have. Due to the printed sorry, adding a
testcase with -fdump-tree-* is also not possible, yet.
For reverse offload, the plan is to call
GOMP_target_ext
inside the on the device, passing
