Hi Paul,
> Is there a test for an error with -std=f2003? If not, you should, perhaps,
> include one.
after checking for the corresponding error message, I found that
ptr-func-2.f90 already covers this case. Considering this, I'll
rename the current testcase from pr100218.f90 to ptr-func-4.f90.
Hi Harald,
Another good one - OK for master but wait a while for 11-branch.
I am a bit hesitant about 10-branch because this is not a regression. That
said, this is harmless because it is permissive, so I will leave it to you
to decide.
Is there a test for an error with -std=f2003? If not, you
Dear Fortranners,
while analyzing a different PR (PR100154), Tobias pointed out that the
target of a pointer from the evaluation of function-reference is allowed
to be used in a variable definition context and thus as an actual
argument to a function or subroutine.
This seems to be a more
