Hello,
is it possible to integrate this patch into the GCC 4.8 release?
On 10/24/2012 04:50 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
This patch fixes my problem, but I am absolutely not sure if
Hello Alan,
maybe it is better to use a require effective target instead of the
{ target powerpc*-*-eabi* powerpc*-*-elf* powerpc*-*-linux* }
patterns scattered around in the testsuite? One problem with this is that test
cases for one of these will likely also work with powerpc*-*-rtems*. I
On 10/26/2012 02:22 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
here is a test case for PR55033.
Is there something wrong with this test case? It compiles well with Alan's
patch.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90
Hello,
what needs to be done to get this committed?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:45:40PM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:22 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
here is a test case for PR55033.
Is there something wrong with this test case? It compiles well with Alan's
patch.
It looks OK to me if you replace your gd-do
Hello,
here is a test case for PR55033.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese
Hello Alan,
thanks for looking at this issue.
On 10/24/2012 04:50 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
This patch fixes my problem, but I am absolutely not sure if this is the
right way.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
This patch fixes my problem, but I am absolutely not sure if this is the
right way.
[snip]
This is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9571 all over again.
IMHO your
Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
From 7770cb04ee95666e745f96b779edec10560203e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:06:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Potential fix for PR55033
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
This patch