I am not sure why this is failing on Solaris/SPARC, do you have the
vector dump file from the test so we can see what it says about the
loop it stopped vectorizing? I don't have a Solaris/SPARC system here,
I tried to build an 'initial' gcc for sparc-sun-solaris2.11 but I
could not reproduce the
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Any comments from
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> >
>> > Any comments from the power and/or vectorizer folks?
>> On one side I'm
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> >
> > Any comments from the power and/or vectorizer folks?
> On one side I'm inclined to simplify the testsuite by adding
> --param
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I was looking at the latest aarch64 failures and noticed PR 80925. There
> seems to be a consensus to change the tests to reflect the current loop
> peeling behaviour so I have created a patch to do that. There are
I was looking at the latest aarch64 failures and noticed PR 80925. There
seems to be a consensus to change the tests to reflect the current loop
peeling behaviour so I have created a patch to do that. There are three
issues with this patch that might need fixing before it can be checked in.