Re: [Patch] Testsuite fixes for failures caused by patch for PR 80925 - loop peeling and alignment

2017-08-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
I am not sure why this is failing on Solaris/SPARC, do you have the vector dump file from the test so we can see what it says about the loop it stopped vectorizing?  I don't have a Solaris/SPARC system here, I tried to build an 'initial' gcc for sparc-sun-solaris2.11 but I  could not reproduce the

Re: [Patch] Testsuite fixes for failures caused by patch for PR 80925 - loop peeling and alignment

2017-08-04 Thread Rainer Orth
Richard Biener writes: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: >>> > >>> > Any comments from

Re: [Patch] Testsuite fixes for failures caused by patch for PR 80925 - loop peeling and alignment

2017-07-31 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: >> > >> > Any comments from the power and/or vectorizer folks? >> On one side I'm

Re: [Patch] Testsuite fixes for failures caused by patch for PR 80925 - loop peeling and alignment

2017-07-28 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 09:47 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > >  > > Any comments from the power and/or vectorizer folks? > On one side I'm inclined to simplify the testsuite by adding > --param

Re: [Patch] Testsuite fixes for failures caused by patch for PR 80925 - loop peeling and alignment

2017-07-28 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > I was looking at the latest aarch64 failures and noticed PR 80925. There > seems to be a consensus to change the tests to reflect the current loop > peeling behaviour so I have created a patch to do that. There are

[Patch] Testsuite fixes for failures caused by patch for PR 80925 - loop peeling and alignment

2017-07-27 Thread Steve Ellcey
I was looking at the latest aarch64 failures and noticed PR 80925.  There seems to be a consensus to change the tests to reflect the current loop peeling behaviour so I have created a patch to do that.  There are three issues with this patch that might need fixing before it can be checked in.