On 05/26/2012 01:27 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
- for (i = 0; i nelt; i += diff)
+ for (i = 0; i nelt ; i += (diff + 1))
for (j = 0; j= diff; j += 1)
- if (d-perm[i + j] != i + diff - j)
- return false;
+ {
+ /* This is guaranteed to be true as the value of
On 29 May 2012 18:30, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/26/2012 01:27 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
- for (i = 0; i nelt; i += diff)
+ for (i = 0; i nelt ; i += (diff + 1))
for (j = 0; j= diff; j += 1)
- if (d-perm[i + j] != i + diff - j)
- return false;
Hi,
There is an off by one error in neon_evpc_vrev which means it
rarely gets triggerred. The problem is that if you are looking at
d-perm [i +j] and you increment i by just diff you end up starting
looking where you looked at the end of the last place where you
checked. Given this I
