Re: [Patch fortran] PR 68567 - ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

Thanks for the quick answer. Committed as revision r270137. Dominique > Le 3 avr. 2019 à 21:15, Steve Kargl a > écrit : > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:01:42PM +0200, Dominique d'Humières wrote: >> Hi Steve, >> >> Do you agree with the following packaging of your patch for pr68567? >> > > I

Re: [Patch fortran] PR 68567 - ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:01:42PM +0200, Dominique d'Humières wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Do you agree with the following packaging of your patch for pr68567? > I honestly don't remember why I did not submit the patch to the list. If it fixes the bug and regression tests cleanly, then I won't

[Patch fortran] PR 68567 - ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

Hi Steve, Do you agree with the following packaging of your patch for pr68567? 2019-04-03 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68567 * expr.c (gfc_reduce_init_expr): Add extra check to avoid dereferencing a null pointer. 2019-04-03 Dominique d'Humieres PR