Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

2013/6/25 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com: Hello, Looks good to me; just say the new Intel Checked int www CVS. Thanks, K Hi, Kirill, By reviewing webpage of gcc-4.9 changes: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html I noticed there is a duplicate subsection 'IA-32/x86-64' under

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

On 7/2/2013 11:31 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: I think that would be better to merge the content into single 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection. But I have no idea about the order of those two items. Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the change? :-) Hi, thanks for pointing! I think order of

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

Hello, Looks good to me; just say the new Intel Checked int www CVS. Thanks, K

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Igor Zamyatin wrote: This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the gcc-4.9/changes.html page. Looks good to me; just say the new Intel Thanks, Gerald

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

Ping? On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the gcc-4.9/changes.html page. OK to install? Thanks, Igor Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html

[Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

Hi! This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the gcc-4.9/changes.html page. OK to install? Thanks, Igor Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v retrieving

Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

Igor Zamyatin wrote: + li GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont + through code-march=slm/code. Not related to the release notes, but I think it should also be added to gcc/doc/invoke.texi's @item -march=@var{cpu-type} - presumably after the item: @item