On 09/25/2017 11:25 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:00:55AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 09/25/2017 04:52 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> Did you also test Ada? It needs testing. I wanted to try it myself,
>>> but your patch doesn't apply (you included the changelog
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:00:55AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/25/2017 04:52 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Did you also test Ada? It needs testing. I wanted to try it myself,
> > but your patch doesn't apply (you included the changelog bits in the
> > patch), and I cannot easily manually
On 09/25/2017 08:14 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:41:18AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:52:27AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> Bootstrap+testsuite finished on BE, but I forgot to enable stack-clash
>>> protection by default,
On 09/25/2017 04:52 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
>> I also flipped things so that clash protection is enabled by default and
>> re-ran the tests. The idea being to see if I could exercise the path
>> that uses SP_ADJUST a bit more. But that gave me the same results.
>> While I think the
On 09/25/2017 06:41 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:52:27AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Bootstrap+testsuite finished on BE, but I forgot to enable stack-clash
>> protection by default, whoops. Will have results later today (also LE).
>
> Some new failures show
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:41:18AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:52:27AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Bootstrap+testsuite finished on BE, but I forgot to enable stack-clash
> > protection by default, whoops. Will have results later today (also LE).
>
>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:52:27AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Bootstrap+testsuite finished on BE, but I forgot to enable stack-clash
> protection by default, whoops. Will have results later today (also LE).
Some new failures show up:
+FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/vla-1.c -O0 execution
Hi Jeff,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:49:04AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> The go test suite has been run with and without this patch. I've found
> os/signal seems to flip between pass and fail without rhyme or reason.
> It may be related to system load. TestCgoCallbackGC now passes for
> reasons
Enough changed since V3 that I think another review round on the ppc
bits is warranted.
wrap_frame_mem is gone. Allocation, attribute setting and
notes/scheduler barriers are now in rs6000_emit_allocate_stack_1.
handle_residual is gone, it's folded into rs6000_emit_allocate_stack_1.
