On 1/3/24 05:07, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
I know we're deep into stage3 and about to transition to stage4. So if
the consensus is for this to wait, I'll understand
This it the V3 of the ext-dce patch based on Joern's work from last year.
Changes since V2:
Handle
Jeff Law writes:
>>> +
>>> +/* Initialization of the ext-dce pass. Primarily this means
>>> + setting up the various bitmaps we utilize. */
>>> +
>>> +static void
>>> +ext_dce_init (void)
>>> +{
>>> +
>>
>> Nit: excess blank line.
> Various nits have been fixed. I think those are all mine.
On 1/3/24 05:07, Richard Sandiford wrote:
+
+ if (GET_CODE (x) == ZERO_EXTRACT)
+ {
+ /* If either the size or the start position is unknown,
+then assume we know nothing about what is overwritten.
+This is overly conservative,
On 1/4/24 13:44, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
I have successfully bootstrapped and regtested the patch on loongarch64-
linux-gnu. The test cases in the patch (intended for RISC-V) also works
on LoongArch per my manual testing.
I find myself wondering if we should create some kind of target-supports
I have successfully bootstrapped and regtested the patch on loongarch64-
linux-gnu. The test cases in the patch (intended for RISC-V) also works
on LoongArch per my manual testing.
On Mon, 2024-01-01 at 14:04 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> I know we're deep into stage3 and about to transition to
On 1/4/24 06:36, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
I have successfully bootstrapped and regtested the patch on s390. Out
of curiosity I also ran some benchmarks which didn't show much changes
except in one case which I will have to analyze further. If there is
anything interesting I will
I have successfully bootstrapped and regtested the patch on s390. Out
of curiosity I also ran some benchmarks which didn't show much changes
except in one case which I will have to analyze further. If there is
anything interesting I will reach back to you.
Cheers,
Stefan
On Mon, Jan 01, 2024
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Jeff Law writes:
>> [...]
>> + if (GET_CODE (x) == ZERO_EXTRACT)
>> +{
>> + /* If either the size or the start position is unknown,
>> + then assume we know nothing about what is overwritten.
>> + This is overly
Jeff Law writes:
> I know we're deep into stage3 and about to transition to stage4. So if
> the consensus is for this to wait, I'll understand
>
> This it the V3 of the ext-dce patch based on Joern's work from last year.
>
> Changes since V2:
>Handle MINUS
>Minor logic cleanup for
I know we're deep into stage3 and about to transition to stage4. So if
the consensus is for this to wait, I'll understand
This it the V3 of the ext-dce patch based on Joern's work from last year.
Changes since V2:
Handle MINUS
Minor logic cleanup for SUBREGs in ext_dce_process_sets
10 matches
Mail list logo
