2012/6/30 Georg-Johann Lay g...@gcc.gnu.org:
Is there a special reason to restrict it to SYMBOL_REF?
Doesn't the same issue occur with, e.g.
(const (plus (symbol_ref const_int))) or label_ref?
Hi!
We have added splits for symbol_ref plus const and label_ref. With
this patch, assembly code and
On 06/29/2012 06:31 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Ok with this comment?
+;; Split symbol_refs at the later stage (after cprop), instead of
generating
+;; movt/movw pair directly at expand. Otherwise corresponding high_sum
+;; and lo_sum would be merged back into memory load at cprop.
Dmitry Melnik schrieb:
On 06/27/2012 07:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Please update the ChangeLog entry (it's not appropriate to mention
Sourcery G++) and add a comment as Steven has suggested.
Otherwise OK.
Updated.
Ok to commit now?
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
2009-05-29 Julian Brown
+;; Split symbol_refs at the later stage (after cprop), instead of generating
+;; movt/movw pair directly at expand. Otherwise corresponding high_sum
+;; and lo_sum would be merged back into memory load at cprop. However,
I would rewrite part of your comment as
+;; movt/movw is preferable,
On 29 June 2012 14:48, Dmitry Melnik d...@ispras.ru wrote:
On 06/27/2012 07:55 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
I must admit that I had been suggesting to Zhenqiang about turning
this off by tightening the movsi_insn predicates rather than adding a
split, but given that it appears to produce
Hi,
We'd like to note about CodeSourcery's patch for ARM backend, from which
GCC mainline can gain 4% on SPEC2K INT:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/plain/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5/linaro/gcc-4.5-linaro-r99369.patch
(also the patch is attached).
Originally, we noticed that GNU Go works
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Dmitry Melnik d...@ispras.ru wrote:
This patch can be applied to current trunk and passes regtest successfully
on qemu-arm.
Maybe it will be good to have it in trunk?
If everybody agrees, we can take care of committing it.
If the patch is approved, can you
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:58:36 +0400
Dmitry Melnik d...@ispras.ru wrote:
This patch can be applied to current trunk and passes regtest
successfully on qemu-arm.
Maybe it will be good to have it in trunk?
If everybody agrees, we can take care of committing it.
No objection from me (as the
On 27/06/12 15:58, Dmitry Melnik wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to note about CodeSourcery's patch for ARM backend, from which
GCC mainline can gain 4% on SPEC2K INT:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/plain/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5/linaro/gcc-4.5-linaro-r99369.patch
(also the patch is
On 27 June 2012 15:58, Dmitry Melnik d...@ispras.ru wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to note about CodeSourcery's patch for ARM backend, from which GCC
mainline can gain 4% on SPEC2K INT:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/plain/recipes/gcc/gcc-4.5/linaro/gcc-4.5-linaro-r99369.patch
(also the
10 matches
Mail list logo