Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Minimal supports for new extensions in profile.

2022-11-02 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 15:20:57 PDT (-0700), philipp.toms...@vrull.eu wrote: On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 23:06, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 05:52:34 PDT (-0700), jia...@iscas.ac.cn wrote: > This patch just add name support contain in profiles. > Set the extension version as 0.1. Or

Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Minimal supports for new extensions in profile.

2022-11-02 Thread Philipp Tomsich
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 23:06, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 05:52:34 PDT (-0700), jia...@iscas.ac.cn wrote: > > This patch just add name support contain in profiles. > > Set the extension version as 0.1. > > Or maybe v0.8, as they're in the v0.8 profile spec? I doubt it really >

Re: [RFC] RISC-V: Minimal supports for new extensions in profile.

2022-11-02 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 05:52:34 PDT (-0700), jia...@iscas.ac.cn wrote: This patch just add name support contain in profiles. Set the extension version as 0.1. Or maybe v0.8, as they're in the v0.8 profile spec? I doubt it really matters, though. Either way we'll need a -mprofile-spec-version

[RFC] RISC-V: Minimal supports for new extensions in profile.

2022-11-02 Thread jiawei
This patch just add name support contain in profiles. Set the extension version as 0.1. gcc/ChangeLog: * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: New extensions. * config/riscv/riscv-opts.h (MASK_ZICCAMOA): New mask. (MASK_ZICCIF): Ditto. (MASK_ZICCLSM): Ditto.