On Jul 24, 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> I thought of a way to not break it: enable the debug info generation
>> machinery, including VTA and SFN, but discard those only at the very end
>> if -g is not enabled. The downside is that it would likely slow -Og
>> down significantly, but who uses it
On 07/24/2018 09:06 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
>> There's a design principle in GCC that code generation and debug generation
>> are independent. This guarantees that if you're encountering a problem in an
>> application without debug info, you can
On Jul 24, 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> There's a design principle in GCC that code generation and debug generation
> are independent. This guarantees that if you're encountering a problem in an
> application without debug info, you can recompile it with -g and be certain
> that you can
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:30:30PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 07/16/2018 05:10 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 07/16/2018 03:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>> Any comments?
> >>
> >> Interesting idea. I wonder if that should be generalized
> >>
