Re: [RFC PATCH] Add inlining growth bias flag

2019-09-12 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:59 PM Graham Markall wrote: > > This patch is an RFC to invite comments as to whether the approach > to solving the problem is a suitable one for upstream GCC, or whether > there are alternative approaches that would be recommended. > > Motivation > -- > > We

Re: [RFC PATCH] Add inlining growth bias flag

2019-09-11 Thread Graham Markall
Hi Jeff, On 09/09/2019 19:55, Jeff Law wrote: > I'm not sure if we really want to expose this as a first class option. > Perhaps a PARAM would be better. Jan would have the final call though > since he's done the most work on the IPA bits. Many thanks for the suggestion - I could turn it into a

Re: [RFC PATCH] Add inlining growth bias flag

2019-09-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 9/6/19 4:58 AM, Graham Markall wrote: > This patch is an RFC to invite comments as to whether the approach > to solving the problem is a suitable one for upstream GCC, or whether > there are alternative approaches that would be recommended. > > Motivation > -- > > We have observed

[RFC PATCH] Add inlining growth bias flag

2019-09-06 Thread Graham Markall
This patch is an RFC to invite comments as to whether the approach to solving the problem is a suitable one for upstream GCC, or whether there are alternative approaches that would be recommended. Motivation -- We have observed that in some cases the estimation of callee growth for