Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-26 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 05:16:10AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:55:39AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > > If you use a macro that doesn't exist, the compiler simply does not > > > build! > > > > My empirical evidence to the contrary says your theoretical arguments >

Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-25 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:55:39AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:31:43PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 02:59:34PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > > Those instructions aren't generated, we don't see them anywhere on a > > > power10 all-lang

Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-24 Thread Alan Modra via Gcc-patches
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:31:43PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 02:59:34PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > Those instructions aren't generated, we don't see them anywhere on a > > power10 all-lang bootstrap except in one testcase designed to exercise > > them. > > But

Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-24 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 02:59:34PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 04:06:57PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 09:41:30AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:03:14AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020

Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-23 Thread Alan Modra via Gcc-patches
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 04:06:57PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 09:41:30AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:03:14AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:58:10AM -0700, Carl Love wrote: > > > > OK, looks like

Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-23 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 09:41:30AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:03:14AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:58:10AM -0700, Carl Love wrote: > > > OK, looks like VSX_MM_SUFFIX doesn't exist anymore. Don't know what > > > happed to it. Thanks. >

Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-22 Thread Alan Modra via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:03:14AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:58:10AM -0700, Carl Love wrote: > > OK, looks like VSX_MM_SUFFIX doesn't exist anymore. Don't know what > > happed to it. Thanks. > > It never existed on trunk. Please always regstrap patches on

Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-22 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:58:10AM -0700, Carl Love wrote: > OK, looks like VSX_MM_SUFFIX doesn't exist anymore. Don't know what > happed to it. Thanks. It never existed on trunk. Please always regstrap patches on trunk before committing. It feels unnecessary at times, but now you know why

Re: [RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-22 Thread Carl Love via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 17:21 +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > gcc.target/powerpc/vsx_mask-count-runnable.c and others > Assembler messages: > Error: unrecognized opcode: `vcntmb' > > I'm applying this one as obvious. Ref > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/549757.html > > *

[RS6000] VSX_MM_SUFFIX

2020-10-22 Thread Alan Modra via Gcc-patches
gcc.target/powerpc/vsx_mask-count-runnable.c and others Assembler messages: Error: unrecognized opcode: `vcntmb' I'm applying this one as obvious. Ref https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-July/549757.html * config/rs6000/vsx.md (vec_cntmb_, vec_extract_),