Re: [SMS] Schedule normalization after scheduling branch

2016-01-20 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/18/2016 02:38 PM, Roman Zhuykov wrote: Hello, 4 years ago when I create some SMS patches nobody cares about SMS failures on ia64. Now ia64 is even more dead but at least one of bugs appears on powerpc - PR69252. Proposed patch is here:

Re: [SMS] Schedule normalization after scheduling branch

2016-01-20 Thread Martin Sebor
On 01/18/2016 02:38 PM, Roman Zhuykov wrote: Hello, 4 years ago when I create some SMS patches nobody cares about SMS failures on ia64. Now ia64 is even more dead but at least one of bugs appears on powerpc - PR69252. Proposed patch is here:

Re: [SMS] Schedule normalization after scheduling branch

2016-01-20 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/20/2016 02:30 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: 2016-01-20 Martin Sebor PR target/69252 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr69252.c: New test. This is OK once the fix for the scheduler goes in. It could be improved by moving it into gcc.dg since I don't see anything in it

Re: [SMS] Schedule normalization after scheduling branch

2016-01-18 Thread Roman Zhuykov
Hello, 4 years ago when I create some SMS patches nobody cares about SMS failures on ia64. Now ia64 is even more dead but at least one of bugs appears on powerpc - PR69252. Proposed patch is here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/txt00266.txt and it even suits current trunk without

[SMS] Schedule normalization after scheduling branch

2011-12-29 Thread Roman Zhuykov
This week I investigated modulo scheduler on IA64. Enabling SMS by default (-fmodulo-sched -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves) leads to bootstrap failure on IA64: gcc/build/genautomata.o differs while comparing stages 2 and 3. I haven't studied this issue in detail, because the combination of these