On 20/06/12 15:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 02:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> This patch is the first of a series to remove support for the now
>> obsolete FPA and Maverick co-processors.
>>
>> This patch removes those targets and configuration options that were
>> marked as deprec
On 06/13/2012 02:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
This patch is the first of a series to remove support for the now
obsolete FPA and Maverick co-processors.
This patch removes those targets and configuration options that were
marked as deprecated in GCC-4.7 and removes the config fragments that
de
On 13/06/12 14:19, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 02:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> (arm*-*-rtems*): Remove.
>
> For RTEMS the intention was to rename arm*-*-rtemseabi* into arm*-*-rtems*
> and
> provide an arm*-*-rtemself* legacy target. My personal opinion is to avoid a
> arm
It will naturally disappear when gcc does the clean up. It won't be around
long.
Sebastian Huber wrote:
>On 06/13/2012 02:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> (arm*-*-rtems*): Remove.
>
>For RTEMS the intention was to rename arm*-*-rtemseabi* into arm*-*-rtems* and
>provide an arm*-*-rtemse
On 06/13/2012 02:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
(arm*-*-rtems*): Remove.
For RTEMS the intention was to rename arm*-*-rtemseabi* into arm*-*-rtems* and
provide an arm*-*-rtemself* legacy target. My personal opinion is to avoid a
arm*-*-rtemself* legacy target, but it was decided othe
This patch is the first of a series to remove support for the now
obsolete FPA and Maverick co-processors.
This patch removes those targets and configuration options that were
marked as deprecated in GCC-4.7 and removes the config fragments that
depended on them.
* config.gcc (unsupported
