On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:49, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 16:40 +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> > On 02/03/2020 15:46, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > More minor fallout from Vlad's IRA changes.
> > >
> > > Previously this test used r3 to hold a value across a call (it's an ipa-ra
> >
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 16:40 +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 02/03/2020 15:46, Jeff Law wrote:
> > More minor fallout from Vlad's IRA changes.
> >
> > Previously this test used r3 to hold a value across a call (it's an ipa-ra
> > test). After Vlad's changes we're using r1 instead.
> >
On 02/03/2020 16:44, Jeff Law wrote:
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 16:40 +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 02/03/2020 15:46, Jeff Law wrote:
More minor fallout from Vlad's IRA changes.
Previously this test used r3 to hold a value across a call (it's an ipa-ra
test). After Vlad's changes
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 16:40 +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 02/03/2020 15:46, Jeff Law wrote:
> > More minor fallout from Vlad's IRA changes.
> >
> > Previously this test used r3 to hold a value across a call (it's an ipa-ra
> > test). After Vlad's changes we're using r1 instead.
> >
On 02/03/2020 15:46, Jeff Law wrote:
More minor fallout from Vlad's IRA changes.
Previously this test used r3 to hold a value across a call (it's an ipa-ra
test). After Vlad's changes we're using r1 instead.
This patch makes the obvious change to pattern we can for which should bring
the
More minor fallout from Vlad's IRA changes.
Previously this test used r3 to hold a value across a call (it's an ipa-ra
test). After Vlad's changes we're using r1 instead.
This patch makes the obvious change to pattern we can for which should bring
the test back to a passing status.
There's a
