On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:48:52PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Ok, thanks.
Jakub
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 12:13:32PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I never remember to update the copyright years, so I thought I'd have a go.
And you were right of course. It ended up being a huge time sink.
Anyway, here's my attempt a script
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Anyway, here's my attempt a script to convert to ranges and, if enabled,
to include the current year. The script only updates FSF copyright notices
and leaves others alone. I've tried my best to make sure that licences
and imported FSF sources
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Anyway, here's my attempt a script to convert to ranges and, if enabled,
to include the current year. The script only updates FSF copyright notices
and leaves others alone. I've tried my best to
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think a patch for each directory will need posting separately for review
of such things as whether any imported / generated files are mistakenly
changed.
So fixincludes/ separate from gcc/, and every
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Anyway, here's my attempt a script to convert to ranges and, if enabled,
to include the current year. The script only updates FSF copyright notices
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 12:13:32PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I never remember to update the copyright years, so I thought I'd have a go.
And you were right of course. It ended up being a huge time sink.
Anyway, here's my attempt a script to convert to ranges and, if enabled,
to
On Jan 6, 2013, at 4:13 AM, Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Anyway, here's my attempt a script to convert to ranges and, if enabled,
to include the current year.
I don't think we should update to the current year.
The script only updates FSF copyright notices
and leaves
On Jan 6, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
I did the analysis by case reduction so that like case classes reduce to
generalized forms and then I audited all the forms of changes that appeared.
This lets me skip quickly the majority of changes and focus in on just
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 12:13:32PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I never remember to update the copyright years, so I thought I'd have a go.
And you were right of course. It ended up being a huge time sink.
Anyway, here's my attempt a script to
Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net writes:
On Jan 6, 2013, at 4:13 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Anyway, here's my attempt a script to convert to ranges and, if enabled,
to include the current year.
I don't think we should update to the current year.
It just seems
Hi!
I've run a script to notice gcc maintained files with FSF copyright that
have been modified in 2011 and/or 2012 (according to svn log, ignoring
r168438 and r184997 commits), but didn't have years 2011 and/or 2012
included in Copyright lines. I've kept the preexisting style, so
where year
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
I've run a script to notice gcc maintained files with FSF copyright that
have been modified in 2011 and/or 2012 (according to svn log, ignoring
r168438 and r184997 commits), but didn't have years 2011 and/or 2012
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:44:13AM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I've run a script to notice gcc maintained files with FSF copyright that
have been modified in 2011 and/or 2012 (according to svn log, ignoring
r168438 and
14 matches
Mail list logo
