Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk.
There was a c++11_only dg-error in this testcase, for a "body of constexpr function is not a return statement" diagnostic that was bogus, but happened because the return statement was ill-formed. A change to G++ earlier this month means that diagnostic is no longer emitted, so remove the dg-error. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc: Remove dg-error for C++11_only error. --- .../testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc index bac16ffd521..6a7a584c71e 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc @@ -52,4 +52,3 @@ auto b = a < a; // { dg-error "no match for 'operator<'" "" { target c++20 } 0 } // { dg-error "no match for .*_Synth3way|in requirements" "" { target c++20 } 0 } // { dg-error "ordered comparison" "" { target c++17_down } 0 } -// { dg-error "not a return-statement" "" { target c++11_only } 0 } -- 2.31.1