Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk.


There was a c++11_only dg-error in this testcase, for a "body of
constexpr function is not a return statement" diagnostic that was bogus,
but happened because the return statement was ill-formed. A change to
G++ earlier this month means that diagnostic is no longer emitted, so
remove the dg-error.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

        * testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc:
        Remove dg-error for C++11_only error.
---
 .../testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc  | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git 
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc
index bac16ffd521..6a7a584c71e 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/overloaded2.cc
@@ -52,4 +52,3 @@ auto b = a < a;
 // { dg-error "no match for 'operator<'" "" { target c++20 } 0 }
 // { dg-error "no match for .*_Synth3way|in requirements" "" { target c++20 } 
0 }
 // { dg-error "ordered comparison" "" { target c++17_down } 0 }
-// { dg-error "not a return-statement" "" { target c++11_only } 0 }
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to