It seems that some of these extensions are not caught by -std=f95
I’ve now audited the I/O specifiers for such warnings too. A warning existed
only for EXIST, which was introduced way back by Steve:
2010-07-05 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/44797
*
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:38:06PM +0200, FX wrote:
It seems that some of these extensions are not caught by -std=f95
I?ve now audited the I/O specifiers for such warnings too. A warning existed
only for EXIST, which was introduced way back by Steve:
2010-07-05 Steven G. Kargl
I’ve extended the logical warning to the NAMED, OPENED, and PENDING
specifiers. I’ve also audited the integer specifiers, and extended the
warning to NUMBER, NEXTREC, and RECL, which were missing.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin13, OK to commit?
Committed as rev. 211323.
