Re: [fortran, patches] Two short patches to review

2011-11-09 Thread FX
Although I suspect you've been lurking in the background, welcome back to the land of gfortran hacking. Your first screw up is free, additional screw ups require you to fix your screw up and fix an additional bug as your reward. Attached patch committed as revision 181200. FX

[fortran, patches] Two short patches to review

2011-11-08 Thread FX
PRs 50540 and 50404 each contain a short patch, written by Steve. Both patches are straightforward: -- 50404: refuse to have a CLOSE statement without a UNIT (F2008's C908 A file-unit-number shall be specified in a close-spec-list) (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50404) --

Re: [fortran, patches] Two short patches to review

2011-11-08 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:13:10AM +0100, FX wrote: PRs 50540 and 50404 each contain a short patch, written by Steve. Both patches are straightforward: -- 50404: refuse to have a CLOSE statement without a UNIT (F2008's C908 A file-unit-number shall be specified in a close-spec-list)

Re: [fortran, patches] Two short patches to review

2011-11-08 Thread FX
-- 50404: refuse to have a CLOSE statement without a UNIT (F2008's C908 A file-unit-number shall be specified in a close-spec-list) (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50404) jerry already approved this one. And I committed it as rev. , with a slight modification to add a decent

Re: [fortran, patches] Two short patches to review

2011-11-08 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:57:29AM +0100, FX wrote: -- 50404: refuse to have a CLOSE statement without a UNIT (F2008's C908 A file-unit-number shall be specified in a close-spec-list) (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50404) jerry already approved this one. And I committed