Hi Cesar!
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:57:22 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 10/08/2014 02:38 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:22:52 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> > wrote:
> >> There is a reduction bug [...]
> >> This patch also includes a runtime test case. I won't apply it
On 10/08/2014 02:38 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:22:52 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
>> There is a reduction bug [...]
>
> Thanks for looking into this!
>
>> This is a problem because initialize_reduction_data originally expected
>> a GIMPLE_BIND at the very beginning
Hi Cesar!
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:22:52 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> There is a reduction bug [...]
Thanks for looking into this!
> This is a problem because initialize_reduction_data originally expected
> a GIMPLE_BIND at the very beginning of a parallel block. [...]
Does your patch also
There is a reduction bug exposed in the following parallel block.
#pragma acc parallel copy(b[0:3][0:3]) copy(l)
{
#pragma acc loop collapse(2) reduction(+:l)
for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < 2; j++)
if (b[i][j] != 16)
l += 1;
