[resending plain text. Sorry for the noise.]
[sorry, i got stuck doing a bunch of other things.]
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:05, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Chris Demetriou c...@google.com wrote:
In theory, a more general warning-text-addition
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:19, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a reason why this cannot be an option that someone passes on
the command line of GCC instead of a configure option?
I don't think we ever considered that approach.
That's actually a great idea, I think better for our
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Chris Demetriou c...@google.com wrote:
In theory, a more general warning-text-addition mechanism could be useful.
e.g. a flag that said when outputting a warning about flag 'foo',
output this additional text could be useful.
However, we haven't felt the need to
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:27, Chris Demetriou c...@google.com wrote:
Diego,
I know this is a truly horrible and broken way to do this, but alternatives
(e.g., NLS) don't really work for us.
bootstrapped without new configuration (x86-64 ubuntu lucid, didn't bother
to run tests),
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
OK for google/main?
Is there a reason why this cannot be an option that someone passes on
the command line of GCC instead of a configure option? Also can you
show an example of why this message would be changed?
Thanks,
