> The second hunk was already in? Still OK.
Yeah, Jakub asked me to change the numbers for the DW_FORM codes for
upstream checkin, but the DW_AT codes we're using are OK.
-cary
On 1/26/12 5:50 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
OK to backport this from trunk to google/main and google/gcc-4_6?
Sorry, that diff isn't right, since an earlier version of this patch
is already in those branches. Here's the right diff...
The second hunk was already in? Still OK.
Diego.
> OK to backport this from trunk to google/main and google/gcc-4_6?
Sorry, that diff isn't right, since an earlier version of this patch
is already in those branches. Here's the right diff...
-cary
2012-01-26 Cary Coutant
* dwarf2.h (enum dwarf_form): Update Fission extensions, add
w
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 17:45, Cary Coutant wrote:
> OK to backport this from trunk to google/main and google/gcc-4_6?
Yes.
Diego.
OK to backport this from trunk to google/main and google/gcc-4_6?
[I've fixed the include/ChangeLog entry from "include/dwarf2.h" to "dwarf2.h".]
-cary
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>> Especially in this case where it is primarily for experimenting with it I
>> think usi
