Re: (Non-)offloading diagnostics (was: [hsa 0/10] Merge of HSA branch)

2016-01-26 Thread Alexander Monakov
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > A very similar problem also exists for nvptx offloading (Nathan CCed), > where we emit similar warnings (enabled by default). As nvptx offloading > happens during link-time (not compile-time, as with hsa offloading), > these don't affect GCC's compile

(Non-)offloading diagnostics (was: [hsa 0/10] Merge of HSA branch)

2016-01-26 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:51:48 +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:46:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:17:58PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > [...] There are no failing > > > testcases if HSA is not configured. If it is, there are some, a

Re: [hsa 0/10] Merge of HSA branch

2015-12-10 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:46:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:17:58PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Because I have not been able to come up with any solution to failing > > libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/target-2.C, I have disabled use of > > dynamic parallelism

Re: [hsa 0/10] Merge of HSA branch

2015-12-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:17:58PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > Because I have not been able to come up with any solution to failing > libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/target-2.C, I have disabled use of > dynamic parallelism in this merge (I keep it on the branch) and > therefore entirely rely on the

[hsa 0/10] Merge of HSA branch

2015-12-07 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, I'm sorry it took me more than a month to come up with another round of patches aiming at merging the HSA branch into the trunk. Keeping up-to date with the latest changes in the OpenMP 4.5 area was strenuous and we have discovered and fixed a few bugs as I intensified my testing efforts. Wh