On 22/07/16 17:12 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
Would it be possible to fix the missed optimization to give the better
asm without having to do -ffast-math as mentioned here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00034.html
If so, then the proposed implementation would be optimized for the
Would it be possible to fix the missed optimization to give the better
asm without having to do -ffast-math as mentioned here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-11/msg00034.html
If so, then the proposed implementation would be optimized for the simple case.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:55 AM,
On 22/07/16 19:38 +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote:
2016-07-22 9:55 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely :
On 22/07/16 08:51 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/07/16 19:38 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
wrote:
Here is
2016-07-22 9:55 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely :
> On 22/07/16 08:51 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 21/07/16 19:38 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
>>> wrote:
Here is an implementation of P0025
On 22/07/16 08:51 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/07/16 19:38 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
Here is an implementation of P0025
An algorithm to "clamp" a value between a pair of boundary values.
Testing is almost
On 21/07/16 19:38 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
Here is an implementation of P0025
An algorithm to "clamp" a value between a pair of boundary values.
Testing is almost finished - looks good so far.
OK if testing passes?
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Here is an implementation of P0025
> An algorithm to "clamp" a value between a pair of boundary values.
>
> Testing is almost finished - looks good so far.
>
> OK if testing passes?
>
> I didn't see a feature test in
On 15/07/16 13:34 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
OK for trunk, thanks.
I didn't see a feature test in any of the SD-6 papers or P0025.
p0096r3 proposes __cpp_lib_clamp = 201603.
I added the feature macro and committed the attached as 238383.
Thanks,
Ed
2016-07-15 Edward
OK for trunk, thanks.
I didn't see a feature test in any of the SD-6 papers or P0025.
p0096r3 proposes __cpp_lib_clamp = 201603.
I added the feature macro and committed the attached as 238383.
Thanks,
Ed
2016-07-15 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Implement C++17
On 14/07/16 19:50 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Here is an implementation of P0025
An algorithm to "clamp" a value between a pair of boundary values.
Testing is almost finished - looks good so far.
OK if testing passes?
OK for trunk, thanks.
I didn't see a feature test in any of the SD-6
Here is an implementation of P0025
An algorithm to "clamp" a value between a pair of boundary values.
Testing is almost finished - looks good so far.
OK if testing passes?
I didn't see a feature test in any of the SD-6 papers or P0025.
2016-07-15 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
11 matches
Mail list logo